Showing posts with label Hinckley Point C. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hinckley Point C. Show all posts

Saturday, October 08, 2011

Stop Hinckley C nuclear power station campaign gets underway

The Stop Hinckley C nuclear power station blockade
As RWE threatens to follow SSE in pulling out of plans to build a new generation of nuclear power stations in the UK, up to 400 protestors formed a blockade this week to oppose the construction of EDF's Hinkley C plant in Somerset.

Locals and other supporters held a minute's silence on Monday for the victims of the Fukishima fallout, and then released 206 helium balloons, one for each day since the disaster.

Earlier in the previous week a Stop Hinkley camp had been set up four miles away from the blockade site with workshops and speakers, and on Saturday (1st) protestors marched from EDF's offices in Bridgwater around the town.

According to the website, supporters include former LibDem leader Paddy Ashdown, cartoonist Raymond Briggs, actor Julie Christie, Monty Python's Terry Jones, Green MP Caroline Lucas, former Labour Environment Secretary Michael Meacher, and composer John Williams.

Stop New Nuclear spokesperson, Andreas Speck, said the blockade has put the government and EDF on the back foot. "Following the interest this blockade has attracted, both regionally and nationally, the government and EDF can no longer claim that the we need nuclear energy to keep the lights on."

He continued: "Germany has committed to a nuclear-free future without buying nuclear power from France or building new coal-fired power stations. The German government is looking at a decentralised energy model with a mix of renewables and Combined Heat and Power (CHP) to bridge the gap left by withdrawal from nuclear. If Germany can do it, why can’t we?"

Angie Zelter, who in 1996 attacked a Hawk jet being sold in the UK to suppress pro-democracy protests in East Timor (and was cleared of criminal damage), lampooned EDF’s claims that Hinkley Point is sustainable. "Radioactive waste from the proposed new ERP reactors will be so toxic that it will have to be stored on the site for over 100 years. With the growth in extreme weather conditions there is no guarantee that this waste can be stored safely," she said.

The reactor planned for Hinkley C is based on an untested design, a European Pressurized Reactor. It would be the fourth of its type; two others in Finland and France are way over budget, behind schedule and not yet operational.

The one at Flamanville, France, is four years behind and currently estimated to cost twice as much as the original price tag. Two people have died on its construction site and the plant is not expected to go onstream before 2016 at the very earliest.

EDF, the most experienced constructor in the world, has admitted it has not mastered the engineering techniques demanded by the hugely complex and complicated design of the 1,650 MWe reactor.

The Olkiluoto plant in Finland too has seen massive cost overruns and delays, with the Finnish government and Areva now locked in an expensive legal battle.

EDF (Electricité de France) says the preparatory work at Hinckley includes commitments for more than £25 million worth of measures to mitigate the impact of the new build project.

EDF's planning application included the clearing of 420 acres of land, drilling boreholes and concreting the site, but this work will precede any decision by the Infrastructure Planning Committee on whether the full construction can proceed. An application to the IPC is to be submitted later this year.

With its partner Centrica, it has submitted applications for a Nuclear Site Licence.

If it were to go ahead, ot would be the first nuclear power station to be built in the country for over 20 years.

A legal challenge to EDF's nuclear plans is underway, expected to cost up to £15,000. This is a lot for a small group to raise, so please consider donating here.

There is an Environment Agency consultation on radioactive discharges from Hinkley C, open until 15 December. Please send an objection. Click here for a suggested letter of objection.

Tuesday, August 02, 2011

EDF supremely confident Hinckley Point C nuclear plant will get full planning approval

Last Friday French power company EDF received permission from West Somerset district council to carry out new preparatory groundwork for Hinckley Point C power station which would, if it were to go ahead, be the first nuclear power station to be built in the country for over 20 years.

EDF already manages eight existing nuclear power stations at sites across the country and has published plans to build four new nuclear plants.

The decision follows the publication of the White Paper on Electricity Market Reform on July 12 and ratification of the National Policy Statement for Nuclear by Parliament on July 18.

EDF, with its partner Centrica, has also submitted applications for a Nuclear Site Licence and for environmental permits from the Environment Agency necessary to operate a nuclear power station, and begun the procurement of some major components from the French state-owned nuclear power company Areva.

The planning application includes the clearing of 420 acres of land, drilling boreholes and concreting the site, but this work will precede any decision by the Infrastructure Planning Committee on whether the full construction can proceed. An application to the IPC will be submitted later this year.

Crispin Aubrey, of the Stop Hinkley campaign and a veteran of the anti-nuclear movement, told EAEM that "It is unacceptable to do all this work before the Infrastructure Planning Committee have given permission to build the station itself".

He said that "even the council officers presenting the report said that if permission is not given it would be impossible for the land to be returned to its former state, as the company promises it would do in its application".

He said that EDF's given reason for starting the work now is that it will save a year of construction time. However he himself believes that the true motive is to influence the IPC decision by giving them less reason to oppose the construction on grounds of preserving the natural environment of the site.

Gordon Bell, a spokesperson for EDF's press office, would give no further comment than that they were "looking at the conditions given by the council before commencing work," and were "keen to proceed".

He refused to be drawn on EDF's degree of confidence that the IPC will approve their plans. But they must be suprenely confident otherwise they would not be spending so much now, ahead of the decision.

Where doies there confidence coe from? What do they know that we, the public, do not?

Nor would Bell be drawn on whether they will be in a strong position to finance the construction of the complete plant given their experience of building the one at Flamanville, France, which is four years behind schedule, has had two fatalities and is currently estimated to cost twice as much as the original price tag.

All he could do was parrot what is in their press release: "The experience at Flamanville is invaluable as we progress in the UK. Each time EDF builds the EPR, our expertise increases.″

Translation: we have made a lot of cock-ups. Hopefully, this means it won't be worse next time. Or, we'll make different cock-ups.

"We have already said publicly that we will publish an adjusted timetable in the autumn. We have also said that this adjusted timetable will take account of the final report from Chief Nuclear Inspector Dr Mike Weightman and the lessons we are learning from experiences and challenges at our new build projects in China and in France," EDF adds.

EDF says the preparatory work includes commitments for more than £25 million worth of measures to mitigate the impact of the new build project. This sounds like a lot of cash, especially to put up if you "don't know" you're going to get planning permission, but when you're dealing with the potential impact of a core meltdown...